Last edited by Sharamar
Thursday, August 6, 2020 | History

2 edition of Comparative judicial politics found in the catalog.

Comparative judicial politics

Theodore L. Becker

Comparative judicial politics

the political functioning of courts.

by Theodore L. Becker

  • 27 Want to read
  • 40 Currently reading

Published by Rand McNally in Chicago .
Written in English


Edition Notes

SeriesRand McNally political science series
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL21471008M

Comparative Judicial Politics. Semester: Spring Class Unique: Course ID: M Credit Hours: 3. Courts around the world are becoming more powerful and more deeply involved in setting public policy, deciding important political and social questions, and constraining democratic politics. COVID Resources. Reliable information about the coronavirus (COVID) is available from the World Health Organization (current situation, international travel).Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this ’s WebJunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus.

In contrast with conventional culturalist accounts, this book argues that the design and functioning of constitutional review are largely a function of politics and interests. Judicial review - the power of judges to rule an act of a legislature or national leader unconstitutional - is a solution to the problem of uncertainty in constitutional Cited by: Part 4 presents a comprehensive overview of Comparative Judicial Politics and Transnational Courts. Each author in this volume provides perspectives on the most current methodological and substantive approaches in their respective areas, along with suggestions for future research.

Course Description: The goal of this course is to expose students to a variety of research topics related to how judicial and legal institutions shape political and economic life, focusing mainly on democracies. The study of judicial politics in political science is primarily about American law and Size: KB. Comparative scholarship on judicial review has paid a lot of attention to the causal impact of politics on judicial decision-making. However, the slower-moving, macro-social process through which judicial review influences societal conceptions of the law/politics relation is less well understood.


Share this book
You might also like
Private Terror/Public Life

Private Terror/Public Life

Understanding materials and why they change

Understanding materials and why they change

Santa Rosa, osiedle polskie w Meksyku

Santa Rosa, osiedle polskie w Meksyku

Sermon on the ploughers.

Sermon on the ploughers.

Memorial of National Convention of Colored Persons, praying to be protected in their civil rights.

Memorial of National Convention of Colored Persons, praying to be protected in their civil rights.

East India (Constitutional reforms: Draft rules under the Government of India Act). Draft rules ... required to give effect to the Notification issued under Section 52 A(1) of the Act on 7th October 1921 by the Governor-General of India in Council with the sanction of His Majesty, constituting Burma a Governors Province under the Act. ...

East India (Constitutional reforms: Draft rules under the Government of India Act). Draft rules ... required to give effect to the Notification issued under Section 52 A(1) of the Act on 7th October 1921 by the Governor-General of India in Council with the sanction of His Majesty, constituting Burma a Governors Province under the Act. ...

National Committee of Japan on Intellectual Co-operation, June, 1927.

National Committee of Japan on Intellectual Co-operation, June, 1927.

New sanctuary manual

New sanctuary manual

U.S.A. holiday in poetry.

U.S.A. holiday in poetry.

Arkitex 1 the Architectural Design Sourcebook

Arkitex 1 the Architectural Design Sourcebook

Americans at war

Americans at war

Theory of colours

Theory of colours

Comparative judicial politics by Theodore L. Becker Download PDF EPUB FB2

An accessible, authoritative, and much-needed introduction to comparative judicial politics that summarizes the key themes of the sub-field, building on seminal works and recent scholarship while discussing a range of real-life examples.

Strongly recommended for law and political science students, and for anyone interested in knowing more about Author: Mary L.

Volcansek. Comparative Judicial Politics [Theodore L. Becker] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This volume was the first to attempt the systematic analysis of the structure and function of the courts as a major method of conflict resolution in society.

Seventeen years after it was first published by Rand McNally in Cited by: This article studies comparative judicial politics, and presents a systematic definition of judicial independence. It presents theoretical explanations — positive and normative — for judicial independence, and examines judicial systems in a classificatory way.

The article concludes with a list of the authors' ideas for empirical by: Comparative Judicial Politics: The Political Functionings of Courts (Rand McNally Political Science Series) [Theodore L.

Becker] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Comparative Judicial Politics synthesizes the now extensive scholarly work on judicial politics from around the world, focusing on legal traditions, lawyers, judges, constitutional review, international and transnational courts, and the impact and legitimacy of courts.

NEAL TATE is Regents' Professor of Political Science at the University of North Texas and the immediate past Chair of the Research Committee on Comparative Judicial Studies of the International Political Science Association.

He has published extensively on Format: Hardcover. About the Author. DONALD W. JACKSON is the Herman Brown Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University.

He has served as Judicial Fellow at the U.S. Supreme Court, and his teaching and research cover a broad range of topics on American and comparative judicial processes. NEAL TATE is Regents' Professor of Political Science at Manufacturer: Praeger. Governments in most political systems are at least rhetorically deferential to this concept.

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation Ferejohn, John A. and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall and Shipan, Charles R., Comparative Judicial Politics (October ).Cited by: Comparative Judicial Politics John Ferejohn, Frances Rosenbluth, and Charles Shipan October 1.

Introduction It is hard to think of a political system that does not trumpet its commitment to “the rule of law,” based on the principle that citizens are better off when the political systemFile Size: KB.

Comparative Judicial Systems: Challenging Frontiers in Conceptual and Empirical Analysis is a comprehensive and cohesive collection of investigative essays written by significant contributors in the field of comparative judicial institutions and politics.

This book serves as a single point of entry for legal scholars and practitioners interested in understanding the field of comparative judicial review in its broader political and social context.

This book’s comparative and interdisciplinary accounts of a phenomenon of worldwide significance and its advanced introduction to the origins, functions, and contours of judicial review make it both accessible and.

Unifying the field of comparative judicial politics opinion, etc.) that the outcome of the judicial process is fair and legitimate, or (b) to support practising lawyers and their clients in Author: Arthur Dyevre. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics offers a critical survey of the field of empirical political science through the collection of a set of articles written by forty-seven scholars in the discipline of comparative politics.

Part I includes articles surveying the key research methodologies employed in comparative politics (the comparative method, the use of history, the practice and. Fortress of Political Liberty, Comparative Studies Conclusion Appendix Sheppardv. Maxwell (U.S.A., ), The Political Use, Abuse, and Misuse of the Judicial Structure Level of Significance in Politics and on Policy Influence, Impact, The Use of Court Systems to Gain and Consolidate Political Power The Use.

Comparative Judicial Politics provides insights into and raises critical questions about how courts at all levels and in divergent settings around the world intersect with politics and charts the implications of what can occur when law, courts, and politics meet.

Category: Political. Comparative Judicial Politics. Book. Jan ; José María Maravall Argentine experience demonstrates the weakness of the rule of law and horizontal accountability and is relevant to the.

Comparative Judicial Politics by Theodore L. Becker,available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. Books shelved as comparative-politics: Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism by Benedict Anderson, Making Democracy W.

Through its imprints Routledge, CRC Press, Psychology Press, and Focal Press, Taylor and Francis are committed to publishing quality books that serve specialist communities. This course will provide an overview of the major debates in comparative judicial politics.

The primary goal is to familiarise students with principal questions and methodological approaches to the study of a major subfield in political science. This is not a course in constitutional law and we will not focus on the development of legal doctrines or the close reading of cases.

Comparative scholarship on judicial review has paid a lot of attention to the causal impact of politics on judicial decision-making. However, the slower-moving, macro-social process through which judicial review influences societal conceptions of the law/politics relation is less well : Theunis Roux.Summary This chapter contains sections titled: Judicial Systems The Territorial Arrangement of the Political System Conclusion References Comparative Judicial Politics and the Territorial Arrangement of the Political System - Comparative Politics - Wiley Online Library.SMNR: Comparative Judicial Politics.

Courts around the world are becoming more powerful and more deeply involved in setting public policy, deciding important political and social questions, and constraining democratic politics.